Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 00:59
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
What are your controversial and hot takes on Naruto?
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Americans Could See Electric Bills Jump 4% in the Summer Heat - PYMNTS.com
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Tesla just lost the head of its robotics division - The Verge
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
On Virgin , Lorde has never been less certain or more alive - AV Club
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How can I get my ex-husband to love me again?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Thank you.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.